We’re continuing a series exploring how communities in Kansas Groundwater Management District #1 are working together to address water challenges and protect water for future generations. Throughout the series, you’ll hear from local leaders, producers and scientists who are turning conversations and real-world decisions into long-term solutions.
In the fourth story, hear from a producer about how long-term solutions started with a calculator. Be sure to listen to the companion podcast at the end of the article.
Transition and Implementation
When the four-county Locally Enhanced Management Area (LEMA) took effect in northwest Kansas, many producers expected disruption. Instead, for farmers like Steve Compton, the transition became a recalibration — one grounded in management, measurement and long-term viability.
Rethinking Water Use
“We’d look at the amount of water that we were putting into our crop, and then figure what we could reduce the water down to, and figure what a return on investment would be,” said Compton, a producer and board member of Groundwater Management District No. 1. “It helped us figure out whether we were actually putting too many inputs into the crop and how efficiently we were using our water.”
The LEMA required producers in the region to reduce groundwater pumping, and Compton cut his use by roughly 25 percent.
Preparing for Change
He said the concept was not a surprise.
“That was something that had been talked about for several years,” he said. “We were anticipating it was going to happen, just weren’t sure what time frame it was going to be implemented.”
The biggest adjustment, he said, was operational.
“Adapting to and figuring out what the balance was between our inputs and our water usage.”
Testing Conservation Practices
Part of Compton’s operation had already been participating in a Water Conservation Area, allowing him to experiment with reduced pumping before the broader LEMA was implemented.
“Part of our operation was already in the Water Conservation Area, and so we had been kind of experimenting with half our farm,” he said. “So that really helped to roll into what we were doing.”
The LEMA structure also allowed producers flexibility to adjust management practices.
“We were able to bank our water over a five year period,” Compton said, that offered the flexibility to experiment.”
Despite cutting pumping, Compton said yields have largely remained stable.
“For the most part, our yields have maintained where we’re at,” he said. “It’s just different timing of the water applications … kind of finding out to a certain extent, that with the old ways we were just over watering our crops.”
Moisture probes became a key tool, especially during wet seasons when irrigation timing matters most.
“Probes are best used in wet years when it’s raining, and then it tells you when you need to turn your pivot back on,” Compton said.
He also shifted from continuous corn to crop rotation and incorporated cover crops to help reduce evaporation and improve soil management.
“The number one problem overall was just efficiency of water usage, trying to maximize every drop that we put out there,” he said.
Shifting Mindset
John Payne, an agronomist who has worked with producers in the region for decades, said the mentality around water use has changed significantly over time.
“It used to be ‘use or lose it.’” Payne said. “Everybody pumped till the end of the year because they had that water and they were going to lose it.”
Today, Payne said producers are seeing the value in management and technology.
“With crop rotations and all the technology we’re using, we can raise more crops with less water more consistently, and being able to bank that water takes some of that risk out of those dry years,” he said.
Adapting Over Time
Looking ahead, Payne said stability will require continued adaptation.
“I think we’re just going to continue adapting for that stability. I don’t think anything’s going to stand still,” he said. “I think we’re just at the beginning of all that.”
From the district’s perspective, communication played a central role in implementation. Compton said outreach efforts helped address concerns early.
“It was education, education, education, and holding town hall meetings, listening to the producers … what their concerns were,” he said. “The communication process has been the key to everything.”
Groundwater Management District #1 Manager Katie Durham said transparency helped ease early uncertainty.
“After sitting down and actually explaining it all and having them walk away with their numbers, it really helped to generate transparency and communication,” Durham said. “The fear factor really started to dissipate.”
Planning for Drought
Durham acknowledged that drought years will continue to test the system, making water banking critical.
“We will have drought years … there are going to be years that are really difficult,” she said. “You pray to God that you did bank during that wet year to have more to use in that dry year.”
She added that new monitoring tools are helping districts show how the Ogallala Aquifer responds to reduced pumping.
“We have ways of tangibly showing people how the aquifer is responding in real time to their change in pumping,” Durham said.
Embracing the Transition
For Compton, the implementation phase ultimately became about perspective.
“Embrace the change and the reward,” he said. “We were presented with the challenge of being able to do the change. We’re rewarded with the satisfaction, and know that it’s working.”
In northwest Kansas, the transition under the LEMA has become less about restriction and more about management — and about demonstrating that long-term water stability and agricultural productivity can move forward together.
To hear more from Steve Compton, listen to the episode below. In the next story, we explore how the journey to Q-stable begins with understanding what the goal is.